The issue of nonconsensual deepfake pornography is a growing concern, with researchers estimating that 90 percent of deepfake videos are of porn, particularly targeting women. Despite the prevalence of this problem, legislators seem to be more focused on political deepfakes rather than intimate image violations.
While there is a push to protect electoral integrity through legislation on political deepfakes, the issue of nonconsensual deepfakes is often overlooked. Republican state representative Matthew Bierlein from Michigan initially became involved in addressing deepfakes through political legislation. However, after collaborating with Democratic representative Penelope Tsernoglou, they expanded their focus to include nonconsensual deepfake bills.
Michigan took a proactive approach to tackling nonconsensual deepfakes, especially after the viral spread of deepfakes featuring Taylor Swift. Bierlein believed that Michigan could set an example for neighboring states by implementing strict laws against deepfake violations. He emphasized the importance of state-level actions to pave the way for regional enforcement.
One of the challenges in addressing nonconsensual deepfakes is the lack of uniformity in laws across different states in the US. The penalties for creating and sharing deepfakes, as well as the level of protection provided, vary significantly. Some states focus on civil and criminal cases against perpetrators, while others target specific demographics such as minors.
Legislation addressing nonconsensual deepfakes of minors tends to garner more consensus due to the unequivocal moral implications. However, when it comes to adult victims, the ethical considerations become more ambiguous. Laws often require proving intent to harm the subject, adding complexity to enforcement and prosecution.
Efforts to combat nonconsensual deepfakes involve a combination of civil and criminal measures, as well as updating existing laws on revenge porn. The evolving nature of technology and the increasing prevalence of deepfakes necessitate a continuous review and adaptation of legal frameworks to address new challenges.
The landscape of nonconsensual deepfake legislation is multifaceted and constantly evolving. While some states have taken proactive steps to combat deepfake violations, inconsistencies and ambiguities in laws remain prevalent. Addressing the ethical and legal complexities of nonconsensual deepfakes requires collaboration, innovation, and a shared commitment to protecting individuals from digital exploitation.
Leave a Reply